The Laboratory for Remote Sensing and Environmental Change (LRSEC)
The Laboratory for Remote Sensing and Environmental Change (LRSEC)
An Interdisciplinary Research Group Using Remote Sensing and Geospatial Science to Understand Landscape Change
  • Home
  • Publications
  • Research Products
  • Team
    • Dr. Gang Chen
    • Chenyu Xing
    • Ravi Thapaliya
    • Rachel Caron
    • Justin Erlick
    • Austin Barbee
  • Prospective Students
  • Teaching
  • News

Latest News in LRSEC

  • Welcome Austin Barbee to join LRSEC October 3, 2024
  • Welcome Justin Erlick to join the lab September 16, 2024
  • Welcome Rachel to join the lab March 21, 2024

Contact Lab Director

Dr. Gang Chen
Address: McEniry 446, 9201 University City Blvd, Charlotte, NC 28223, USA (35°18'26"N 80°43'48"W)
Email: Gang.Chen 'at' charlotte.edu

Links

  • Department of Earth, Environmental and Geographical Sciences
  • College of Humanities & Earth and Social Sciences
  • University of North Carolina at Charlotte

Ozelkan’s paper accepted by International Journal of Digital Earth

December 15, 2015 by Gang Chen
Categories: Updates

A recent submission by Drs. Emre Ozelkan and Gang Chen has been accepted by International Journal of Digital Earth. Congratulations, Emre!

Title: Spatial Estimation of Wind Speed: A New Integrative Model Using Inverse Distance Weighting and Power Law

Abstract:

Spatial interpolation (SI) is currently one of the most common ways to estimate wind speed (Ws). However, classic SI models either ignore the complex geography (e.g., inverse distance weighting (IDW)), or demand high computational resources (e.g., cokriging). This study aimed to develop a simple yet effective SI model for estimating Ws in Eastern Thrace of Turkey. This new method, named MIDW(Ws), is a modified IDW through the integration of IDW with wind profile model, power law (PL), representing the influence of land cover and topography on Ws. Terrain features and elevation data of PL were obtained using normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and digital elevation model (DEM), respectively. Results showed superior and comparable performance of MIDW(Ws) to standard IDW and ordinary kriging (OK) across all months of the tested year. Compared to ordinary cokriging (OCK) using DEM as covariate, MIDW(Ws) generated better results in the arid–semiarid seasons (around summer). Local complex atmospheric conditions during rainy seasons (around winter) may have affected the performance of incorporating PL with MIDW(Ws). Generally, the proposed MIDW(Ws) is simpler and easier to implement compared to OCK. For landscape–scale projects, its high computational efficiency and relatively robust performance show potential to deal with large volumes of data sets.

A comparison of wind speed spatial interpolation maps using MIDW(Ws), IDW, OCK, and OK.

A comparison of wind speed spatial interpolation maps using MIDW(Ws), IDW, OCK, and OK.

Copyright © 2012-2025 Gang Chen, University of North Carolina at Charlotte. All rights reserved.
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In