Public Policy Program
Public Policy Program
People, Places, Things
  • People
    • News
    • Achievements
  • Places
    • Jobs
    • Post Docs
    • Conferences
    • Courses
  • Things
    • Call for Papers and Contributions
    • Deadlines
    • Research Funding Opportunities
  • Ruminations
  • Public Policy Program
  • College of Liberal Arts & Sciences

  • By-Laws and Governance Committee
  • PPOL Committees and Graduate Public Policy Association Officers-2013-2014
  • Public Policy PhD Student Handbook

Recent Posts

  • CONGRATULATIONS TO:
  • Grad Life Fellows
  • Philanthropic Fellowships
  • Visit from Gender and Society Editor: “Making Music, Making Community” (Colloquium, Sociology/Women’s and Gender Studies)
  • Opportunity for US AID Internships

Recent Comments

  • Ada Uche on Congratulations to Dr. Mickelson again!
  • Eleonora Davalos on Kudos to Yudo Anggoro
  • Eleonora Davalos on Mary Jo Shepherd’s new job
  • Petra Porter on Deborah Strumsky’s award-winning paper
  • Samuel Grubbs on APPAM Fall 2014

Categories

  • People
    • Achievements
    • News
  • Places
    • Conferences
    • Courses
    • Events
    • Jobs
    • Post Docs and Fellowships
    • Talks
  • Ruminations
  • Things
    • Call for Papers and Contributions
    • Deadlines
    • Other Funding
    • Research Funding Opportunities

Links

  • Center For Graduate Life
  • Criminal Justice and Criminology
  • Department of Geography & Earth Sciences
  • Department of Political Science and Public Administration
  • Department of Sociology
  • Digital Scholarship Lab
  • Economics
  • PPOL Handbook
  • Project Mosaic
  • Public Policy Databases
  • Student Organizations
  • The Urban Institute
  • UNCC Research Policies and Procedures
Professor, Department of Political Science and Public Administration
AUTHOR

Martha Kropf

Visit from Gender and Society Editor: "Making Music, Making Community" (Colloquium, Sociology/Women's and Gender Studies)

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Events

The Department of Sociology and the Women’s and Gender Studies Program invite you to a colloquium:

 

“Making Music, Making Community: Lesbians, Feminism and the Women’s Music Community”

Presented by:

Dr. Jo Reger

Professor of Sociology and Director of Women’s and Gender Studies, Oakland University; Editor, Gender & Society

Friday January 22 at 11am

480c Fretwell

Opportunity for US AID Internships

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Jobs

Dear Dr/Prof.  Health Professional,

We have a posting on Trialect at www.trialect.com soliciting applications for USAID Summer Internships for Health Professionals. USAID Interns deliver high-level technical support for international projects in maternal and child health, family planning, HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases, and other technical areas. The idea is to create a pipeline for the next generation of global health professionals that is representative of American diversity. This is a paid internship, and the intern can apply to only one program of his/her choice. As the deadline is 10 days away, we are reaching out to see if your fellows would be interested in this program. They can peruse in detail at:  USAID Internships

Thanks,
Trialect Support
​+1.805.850.6002
Support@trialect.com

UC-Riverside--Translational Health positions

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Jobs

CLUSTER HIRE FOR COMMUNITY TRANSLATIONAL HEALTH
(Assistant, Associate or Full Professor)
University of California, Riverside

The University of California, Riverside (UCR) invites applications for a
faculty cluster hire for up to 5 tenured or tenure-track faculty
appointments. The goal of the cluster hire is to significantly increase
UCR’s capacity to conduct high quality interdisciplinary population health
research. It is a multi-position cluster hire that encompasses the College
of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (CHASS), the College of Natural and
Agricultural Sciences (CNAS), the School of Medicine (SOM) and the School
of Public Policy (SPP). Successful candidates will be housed within the
department or departments that fit their research specialization with the
option of a secondary cooperating faculty appointment if appropriate.
Relevant disciplines include, but are not limited to,
Biostatistics/Statistics, Economics, Medicine, Political Science,
Psychology, Public Health, Public Policy, and Sociology.

Successful applicants will join existing faculty to build teams that cut
across departments to create collaborations that can address what would
otherwise be intractable health-related problems. As such, applicants
should show strong interest in or demonstrated capacity to work across
traditional disciplines. We are seeking applications at both junior and
senior levels and plan a mix of these levels when recruitment is complete.
We are particularly interested in applicants with the following
interests/qualifications:

*Biostatistician* (Ph.D. Statistics/Biostatistics):  Analysis of
non-randomized designs, program evaluation, clinical trials, longitudinal
data analysis, survival analysis, evaluation of biomedical impact.

*Physician Researcher* (M.D. with dual degree in public health [M.P.H.] or
social sciences [M.A. or Ph.D.]): Community translational health
interventions and evaluation.

*Population Health Measurement/Estimation* (Ph.D. in
Biostatistics/Statistics, Economics, Psychology, Sociology): Psychometrics;
item response theory; covariance structure models.

*Population Health, Intervention and Policy Evaluation – Two Positions from
Three Areas *(prefer Ph.D. in Epidemiology, Economics, Political Science,
Psychology, Public Policy, Sociology).

·         *Area 1: *Research investigating social, psychological,
political, economic and cultural factors in the diffusion of health
relevant knowledge and technology through populations.

·         *Area 2:* Conceiving, implementing and/or evaluating community
health interventions

·         *Area 3:* Evaluating the health consequences of public policies
directed toward areas other than health (e.g. housing, jobs, water, parks
and recreation)

Applicants should have an established record of outstanding research
accomplishment; demonstrated excellence in teaching; a desire to work
across disciplines; promise with regard to attracting extramural funds; and
a commitment to an ongoing and cutting-edge research program. These
appointments will commence on or after June 30, 2016.

Applications should include a letter of interest, a CV, and a sample of
research work. Application materials for the Assistant Professor position
should be submitted through https://aprecruit.ucr.edu/apply/JPF00511.
Senior applicants should apply through
https://aprecruit.ucr.edu/apply/JPF00510. Candidates applying for the
Assistant Professor position will need to provide 3-4 letters of reference;
individuals applying for positions above the Assistant level will be
required to provide names and contact details for 5-7 confidential
references.

Review of applications will begin January 16, 2016 and will continue until
the position is filled. To ensure full consideration, applications and
supporting material should be received January 15, 2016.

Applicants for this cluster hire will be a part of larger University-wide
expansion as UCR is embarking on a major new hiring initiative that will
add 300 tenure-track positions in 33 cross-disciplinary areas selected
through a peer-reviewed competition. Over the next three years, we will
hire multiple faculty members in each area and invest in research
infrastructure to support their work. This initiative will build critical
mass in vital and emerging fields of scholarship, foster truly
cross-disciplinary work and further diversify the faculty at one of
America’s most diverse research universities. We encourage applications
from scholars committed to excellence and seeking to help redefine the
research university for the next generation. For more details visit
http://clusterhiring.ucr.edu.

UCR is a world-class research university with an exceptionally diverse
undergraduate student body. Its mission is explicitly linked to providing
routes to educational success for underrepresented and first-generation
college students. A commitment to this mission is a preferred
qualification. Advancement through the faculty ranks at the University of
California is through a series of structured, merit based evaluations,
occurring every 2-3 years, each of which includes substantial peer input.

The University of California is an Equal Opportunity/Affirmative Action
Employer with a strong institutional commitment to the achievement of
excellence and diversity among its faculty and staff. All qualified
applicants will receive consideration for employment without regard to
race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national
origin, age, disability, protected veteran status, or any other
characteristic protected by law.

Regulatory Budgeting--Move Back Toward Centralized Regulation?

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Ruminations

What are tools for government action? Fiscal policy? See:

http://www.regblog.org/2016/01/08/tozzi-regulatory-budget/

Rumi Forum Fellowship Program

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Things

Rumi Forum Fellowship Program 2016

Rumi Forum is inviting eligible individuals on a study fellowship that incorporates trips to Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Thailand and Cambodia with the mission of exploring social, economic, cultural, security and political issues in these countries and their wider regions in 2016. You have the option of choosing:

  • Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan
  • Thailand and Cambodia

The dates are:

  • May 13-23, 2016
  • May 20-30, 2016
  • May 27- June 6, 2016

As part of this study fellowship all participants will have to write a 4000 word article. During trips, fellows will have an opportunity to meet with civil society organizations, government officials, journalists, academicians and think-tank scholars, among others, and gain an insight into some of the following:

  • Social harmony, faith and cultural issues
  • Peace building and conflict resolution
  • Economic Development
  • Democratization
  • Women’s issues
  • Minority issues
  • Education
  • Economic, political and social reforms
  • Relations with neighboring countries
  • Relations with the US
  • The role of subject country in the wider region

Fellowship Eligibility and Conditions:

Applicant’s work or field of study should be in the following issues and/or regions:

Regional focus: Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Thailand, Cambodia, Central Asia, South Asia, South East Asia, Russia, China and Asia-Pacific

Issues: Interfaith and social harmony, peace building and peace making, sociology and social movements, NGOs and civil society, religion and culture, international security, geostrategy, global strategy, conflict management/resolution/prevention, international affairs, international development, security studies, defense, terrorism/counter-terrorism, democracy and human rights,  national security, women’s and minority issues, journalism,  energy, politics and political economy.

Eligibility:

3 categories of applicants will be considered:
A) Current PhD students in a field of study as mentioned above
B) PhD graduates with up to 10 years academic experience as it relates to above regions or issues. (Academics with more experience will also be considered)
C) Masters graduates with a minimum of 7 years professional experience as it relates to above regions or issues. Individuals with writing experience will be given preference in this third category, though all interested persons should still apply

Applicants from the following areas will be preferred: Washington DC, Virginia, Maryland, Delaware, North Carolina, West Virginia or Kentucky. Exceptional applications from other states will be considered as in previous years.

Conditions:

  • Fellows will need to submit a post-trip publishable review article of 4000 words where they share their observations and research by September 1, 2016.
    • All submissions will become property of the Rumi Forum.
    • Before publishing elsewhere permission from Rumi Forum must be obtained.
    • If you want to change your synopsis/topic after the submission, please contact us first. The committee will review your request.                      
  • All participants will have to purchase their airfare to and from desired country of trip. The participants are expected to contribute towards some of the expenses. The contribution amount is $750 for full time PhD students and $1000 for all other participants. The rest of the costs related to local transportation, food and accommodation (except personal incidentals) will be sponsored by Rumi Forum and our partners.

How to Apply:

To apply, please complete by March 1, 2016 the application form at this link: http://bit.ly/fellowshipapplication2016. The application form will require you to submit information including the below (via this link):

  • Full Curriculum Vitae
  • 300-400 word biography
  • Statement detailing your current research or your current professional work if you are not a student. All applicants should include details potential benefits of this trip to their study, professional work and future career.
  • Title and 300-400 word synopsis about the topic of your fellowship article as it relates to your current research or other area of interest that will relate to your trip. Once submitted, if you want to change your topic/synopsis, a request must be submitted to the fellowship committee for approval.

Once your application is approved:

  • Full-time students to send in $750 (all others $1000) check payable to Rumi Forum at 750 1st St NE Ste 1120 Washington DC 20002
  • Mail the signed and dated Intercultural Trip Release Form to the Rumi Forum. The form can be found at the above application link. You can mail your check and statement together. If you are a student a statement from your university citing your full-time enrollment must be emailed. All others must email a statement from their current employer. Please email to info@rumiforum.org with the subject line” 2016 Rumi Fellowship Application Name, Last Name, organization “. Please use this same subject line when corresponding with us.
  •  Upon approval of their participation, the participants are expected to buy their international tickets by April 1st, 2016 and send us proof of purchase.

Please visit here to review the papers written by previous Rumi Forum Fellows.
Please do not hesitate to contact us if you have further questions via info@rumiforum.org

Itineraries

You may apply for one of the following trips. The Application form will allow you to select the desired trip and desired dates. Click on below links to see the detailed itineraries:

  1. Kazakhstan and Kyrgyzstan
  2. Thailand and Cambodia

Rumi Forum was founded in 1999 with the mission to foster intercultural dialogue, stimulate thinking and exchange of opinions on supporting and fostering democracy and peace and to provide a common platform for education and information exchange. The Forum wants to contribute to this ultimate aim by means of conferences, panel discussions, projects, scholarships, publications and many other activities. In particular the forum has an interest in issues regarding pluralism, peace building and conflict resolution, intercultural and interfaith dialogue, social harmony and justice, civil rights and community cohesion.

Russell Sage Foundation: New Proposals for Addressing Poverty

January 11, 2016 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Call for Papers and ContributionsThings

Image

CALL FOR ARTICLES

RSF: THE RUSSELL SAGE FOUNDATION JOURNAL OF THE SOCIAL SCIENCES

ANTI-POVERTY POLICY INNOVATIONS: NEW PROPOSALS FOR ADDRESSING POVERTY IN THE UNITED STATES

Edited by Lawrence M. Berger and Katherine Magnuson, University of Wisconsin-Madison; we also expect that
Maria Cancian will join us as a coeditor when she returns from leave in 2016-2017

The Institute for Research on Poverty (IRP) and the Russell Sage Foundation have historically collaborated on a series of edited volumes on poverty and poverty policy, which includes Fighting Poverty, Confronting Poverty, Understanding Poverty, and Changing Poverty, Changing Policies. This series has been widely used by teachers and scholars of poverty and related issues, and has traditionally been comprised of state-of-the art review chapters. The last volume, Changing Poverty, Changing Policies, was published in 2009. Since that time, there have been a number of volumes focusing on the Great Recession, as well as the fifty years of the War on Poverty. These works have extensively reviewed recent trends, research, and policy in the poverty arena. However, much less attention has been focused on innovative, specific anti-poverty policy proposals in light of this evidence. We believe that an issue of RSF highlighting such proposals would greatly serve the field. We outline our vision for the issue below.

The journal issue will showcase a collection of innovative and specific policy proposals intended to reduce poverty in the short- and/or long-term or improve economic wellbeing. Each article will focus on a specific social problem and/or population group. The issue aims to set the anti-poverty policy agenda for the next decade or more by presenting detailed real-world responses to current and emerging poverty-related problems. The policy or inter-related set of policies proposed in each article will include a description of the target group and problem; eligibility criteria; program/service or benefit type and amount; expectations regarding policy scope, reach, and take-up; potential heterogeneity in effects across population groups or geographic location; and expected cost and effectiveness, including public and private costs and benefits. Each article must be firmly grounded in existing social science research and present the science (theoretical and empirical research) underpinning the proposed policy. Articles should not propose an overarching policy agenda in a particular domain. Rather each article should propose a specific, potentially high-impact, innovative, or particularly promising policy or policy approach and present evidence in support of that approach. That is, articles should leverage existing research and policy analyses to present an evidence-based argument for implementing novel and potentially transformational policy innovations in a particular poverty-related domain.

The coeditors will contribute an extensive introductory piece that provides a roadmap of current and expected poverty-related trends, evidence on the causes and consequences of poverty, existing anti-poverty policies, and evidence on the efficacy of existing approaches to addressing poverty. They will also contribute a concluding piece that weighs the pros and cons of the various proposals, including key tradeoffs, feasibility, and prioritization. Selection will be determined by the potential for the proposed policy approach to decrease poverty and/or improve the economic wellbeing of low-income and poor individuals and families, as indicated by the strength and quality of the scientific evidence offered in its support.

Please click here for a full description of the topics covered in this call for papers.

Anticipated Timeline

Prospective contributors should submit a CV and an abstract (up to two pages in length, single or double spaced) of their study along with up to two pages of supporting material (e.g., tables, figures, pictures, etc.) no later than 5 PM EST on April 15, 2016 to:

https://rsfjournal.onlineapplicationportal.com

All submissions must be original work that has not been previously published in part or in full. Only abstracts submitted tohttps://rsfjournal.onlineapplicationportal.com will be considered. Each paper will receive a $1,000 honorarium when the issue is published. All questions regarding this issue should be directed to Suzanne Nichols, Director of Publications, at journal@rsage.org and not to the email addresses of the editors of the special issue.

A conference will take place at RSF in New York City on October 28, 2016. The selected contributors will gather for a one-day workshop to present draft papers (due on September 28, 2016, a month prior to the conference) and receive feedback from the other contributors and editors. Travel costs, food, and lodging for one author per paper will be covered by the foundation. Papers will be circulated before the conference. After the conference, the authors will submit their revised drafts. The papers will then be sent out to two additional scholars for formal peer review. Having received feedback from reviewers and the RSF board, authors will revise their papers. The full and final issue will be published in the late 2017. Papers will be published open access on the RSF website as well as in several digital repositories, including JSTOR and UPCC/Muse.

Please click here for a full description of the topics covered in this call for papers.

Policy History Conference: Call for Papers

November 09, 2015 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Conferences

Dr. Mark Wilson (affiliated PPOL Faculty, History) sends the following call for papers:

Policy History Conference Call for Papers

If the link does not work, then paste this in your browser:

https://jph.asu.edu/2016-call

Association for Public Policy Analysis and Management Conference Upcoming this weekend

November 09, 2015 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Achievements

UNC Charlotte PPOL students and alumni to present papers at APPAM! 

37th Annual Fall Research Conference “The Golden Age of Evidence-Based Policy”

November 12-14, 2015, Miami, Florida

Panel Paper: Gender Equality and Marriage Equality – Are They a Perfect Match?

Thursday, November 12, 2015 : 3:30 PM
Zamora (Hyatt Regency Miami)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Meika R. Berlan, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Gender equality has been examined for its role in influencing an array of issues that societies face to better understand how changes in gender roles and expanded opportunities for women affect sociopolitical norms and behaviors. Expanding on this line of inquiry, gender equality as a key variable of interest, is introduced into an analysis of marriage equality policies, to determine whether gender based inequalities are relevant and significant factors that influence policy decisions around LGBT issues. Utilizing data from a variety of government sources, this study focuses on two key components of gender inequality in the US – wages and political representation – to analyze the impact that these gender based inequalities have on the adoption and diffusion of marriage equality policies at the state level. The interconnected relationship between gender roles and marriage indicate that as bifurcated gender roles break down [leading to greater gender equality], norms around marriage diversify, thereby creating an opportunity for the acceptance and support of marriage equality policies to surface and propagate. This quantitative analysis accounts for important state level factors, to highlight the unique role that gender equality plays in shaping the adoption of public policies regarding same sex marriage. The findings from this study are important and useful, as these public policies have far-reaching implications for individuals, organizations, and governments.

Poster Paper: The Impact of Economic Development on Plant Diversity: A Test of the Environmental Kuznets Curve

Saturday, November 14, 2015
Riverfront South/Central (Hyatt Regency Miami)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Jennie Wienke and Sam Grubbs, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Maintaining biodiversity is an ongoing concern that has salient political views on both sides of the issue. In this study, we analyze the correlation between economic development and plant biodiversity in the Eastern United States. We use the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) for biodiversity to determine if a U-shaped, curvilinear relationship exists between the median family income and the number of endangered and threatened plant species. Previous studies using the EKC at the international level do not consider spatial diversity within a country. This study is unique because we consider the internal impacts on plant biodiversity at the county level including environmental, economic, and geographic conditions. The results indicate that the EKC is potentially present, but the shape of the relationship between income and biodiversity may be different than what was initially proposed. The EKC may be S-shaped. The positive relationship noted in the right half of the EKC begins to taper off at the highest income levels, which may help explain some of the inconsistencies in previous findings.

Poster Paper: The Effects of Rankings on Undergraduate Admission Statistics

Friday, November 13, 2015
Riverfront South/Central (Hyatt Regency Miami)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Sam Grubbs, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Recently, there has a lot of controversy about how admissions officers have tried to manipulate their university statistics in order to present their universities in a better light in national university rankings. The purpose of this research is to analyze how influential university rankings are on where high school seniors choose to apply. This research examines top university rankings in the US News and World Report and two different admission statistics: admission rate and matriculation yield. The results indicate that though a curvilinear relationship between ranking and admission statistics exist, a time fixed-effect model eliminates the significance of ranking on admission outcomes. Overall, time (universities improve each year) and enrollment numbers were significant predictors of admission statistics. This research suggests that work by administrators to move up in university rankings may not be useful because admission statistics are more of a function of campus admission efforts.

Panel Paper: Uncertainty in Accountability: How High-Stakes Test Scores Compare to Grades When Predicting College Achievement

Saturday, November 14, 2015 : 2:25 PM
Japengo (Hyatt Regency Miami)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Jason Giersch, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
One of the criticisms of accountability policies is that high-stakes tests distort instruction, causing those tests to lose validity, especially for students at risk of missing benchmarks. Using a longitudinal dataset from North Carolina, I compare the usefulness of high-stakes test scores in predicting college grades in honors track classes to standard track classes to test whether test scores lose predictive validity in the lower-tracks, where teaching to the test is more likely to occur. According to the results, while test scores for standard track students are indeed less useful predictors of later academic achievement, high school GPA remains just as strong a predictor for standard as for honors classes. Interviews with teachers suggest that this pattern results from the limitations of the exams in contrast to the decisions by teachers to shape instruction and grading to the needs and characteristics of their students.

Full Paper:

  • Giersch at APPAM 2015.pdf (338.2KB)

Poster Paper: What’s in It for Me? the Rewards for Teaching Preferred By the Next Generation of Teachers

Thursday, November 12, 2015
Riverfront South/Central (Hyatt Regency Miami)

*Names in bold indicate Presenter

Jason Giersch, University of North Carolina at Charlotte
Research frequently reveals teacher quality to be an essential element of education quality. Efforts to recruit good teachers have focused on two sets of rewards to the profession: “noble” rewards that emphasize the benefits to children and communities, and more extrinsic rewards, such as good benefits and convenient schedules. This experiment randomly assigned college-age participants to prompts extolling the various benefits of becoming a teacher. Those who were presented with noble rewards expressed greater interest in entering the profession than did those who were exposed to more extrinisic or no rewards, but the strength of this effect varied by gender and race. These results suggest that efforts to recruit talented individuals into teacher preparation programs should emphasize the benefits to the community and the students, not simply to the teacher.

Northwestern University--Post doctoral Health Economics & Policy

November 02, 2015 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Jobs

Post-doctoral fellowship in health economics and policy

This fellowship will allow the post-doctoral fellow to sharpen their analytical skills and advance their research agendas in health policy and health economics through formal and informal training and extensive collaboration with distinguished researchers at Northwestern and access to major healthcare datasets. The position is for one year, but is extendible for a second year subject to performance. The postdoctoral fellow will support a CDC-funded study of the effect of Medicaid expansion on diabetes diagnosis, care, and outcomes (principal researchers:  Prof. Bernard Black, Northwestern Law School and Kellogg School of Management and Dr. Abel Kho, Feinberg School of Medicine). S/he will oversee data collection, data management, data analysis, report writing, and manuscript preparation, and will have an opportunity to participate as a coauthor on research articles.  The fellow will have some unallocated time to pursue other projects, if desired.  Scholars from relevant disciplines, including economics, public policy, health policy, statistics, medicine, and health services research, are invited to apply. The fellowship provides a competitive stipend and benefits.

The fellow will:

*         Develop skills in a Centers-for-Disease-Control sponsored research project

*         Help design and conduct health policy research

*         Formulate research designs and suggest ways to improve these designs, identify potential problems, recommend and implement solutions, and collaborate in the development of new techniques

*         Work closely with experienced investigators to prepare grant applications, potentially including submitting their own research proposals

*         Enhance their training in modern statistical and econometric methods, especially methods for causal inference

*         Attend national conferences as learners and presenters

*         Prepare and publish research papers together with the Principal Investigators
Minimum Qualifications:

*         Completion of a Ph.D. in a relevant discipline, ideally by December 2015 and no later than summer 2016

*         Ability to assist with complex tasks across multiple disciplines and with development and design of novel research projects

*         Strong research record in health policy, health economics, or a related field

*         Proficiency with STATA, SAS, or both

*         Strong scientific writing ability and oral communication skills

*         Ability to work effectively and collegially with colleagues

*         Candidates must be located in Chicago, IL

To apply, email a cover letter, CV, personal statement, 2 or more letters of reference, and 1-2 papers demonstrating the ability to do quantitative research and analysis, to Katherine Schulte (Katherine.schulte@law.northwestern.edu<mailto:Katherine.schulte@law.northwestern.edu>) by December 1, 2015.

Northwestern University is an Equal Opportunity, Affirmative Action Employer of all protected classes including veterans and individuals with disabilities.  Women and minorities are encouraged to apply.  Hiring is contingent upon eligibility to work in the United States.

Bernie Black

Social Policy Analyst, Congressional Research Service

October 28, 2015 by Martha Kropf
Categories: Jobs
Job Title:  Analyst in Social Policy (Social Security)
Department:  Legislative Branch
Agency:  Library of Congress

Job Announcement Number:  150228

SALARY RANGE:
$90,823.00 to $118,069.00 / Per Year
OPEN PERIOD:
Tuesday, October 27, 2015 to Monday, November 30, 2015
SERIES & GRADE:
GS-0101/0110-13
POSITION INFORMATION:
Open – Permanent
PROMOTION POTENTIAL:
15
DUTY LOCATIONS:
1 vacancy – Washington DC, DC   View Map
WHO MAY APPLY:
U.S. citizens
SECURITY CLEARANCE:
Public Trust – Background Investigation
SUPERVISORY STATUS:
No

JOB SUMMARY:

About the Agency

The Congressional Research Service (CRS) Domestic Social Policy Division (DSP) is seeking an Analyst in Social Security to serve the United States Congress by providing expertise on issues pertinent to Social Security (e.g., financing, solvency of trust funds, program impact on beneficiaries, and program design and operations) or related income security programs. Work may include design and evaluation of options for Congress that would change Social Security’s existing benefit and financing structure.

The analyst will prepare authoritative, objective, and non-partisan analytical studies and descriptive and background reports on Social Security and related income security policy; provide personal consultation and assistance to congressional committees, Members, and staff on policies and programs throughout the legislative process; and participate in or lead team research projects and seminars. The analyst is also expected to develop over time the skills necessary to provide legislative analysis and consultation to congressional committees, Members, and staff at increasingly sophisticated levels.

Applicants should have experience conducting policy analysis related to Social Security and income security and must be able to work as part of a collaborative team. The ideal candidate will have knowledge of the theories, principles, and practices of one or more social science or finance disciplines (e.g., economics, demography, public policy, political science, sociology, or related field) as it relates to the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) Program or similar social insurance/income security program; and the ability to design and implement quantitative methodologies and techniques such as regression analysis, cohort analysis, microsimulation, and stochastic modeling. Strong writing, research, and presentation skills are essential.

CRS works exclusively for the United States Congress, providing policy and legal analysis to committees and Members of both the House and Senate, regardless of party affiliation. As a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress, CRS has been a valued and respected resource on Capitol Hill for more than a century.

CRS is well known for analysis that is authoritative, confidential, objective and nonpartisan. Its highest priority is to ensure that Congress has immediate access to the nation’s best thinking on public policy issues of interest to its Members and Committees.

KEY REQUIREMENTS

  • See QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED below.

DUTIES:

Back to top

Prepares a variety of analytical, descriptive and background reports, memoranda, and written materials on subjects or public policy issues within the employee’s designated areas of responsibility to support congressional decision making.

Participates in planning, organizing, and coordinating group research efforts.

Through personal consultation, assists committees, Members, and staff with consideration of legislative issues by providing information and analysis, and by applying professional subject-area knowledge.

Participates in CRS seminars, workshops, and/or outreach programs for committees, Members, and staff.

Locates and provides information requested by Members and committees of Congress or their staff.


QUALIFICATIONS REQUIRED:

Back to top

Applicants must have had progressively responsible experience and training sufficient in scope and quality to furnish them with an acceptable level of the following knowledge, skills, and abilities to perform the duties of the position without more than normal supervision.

  • Knowledge of Social Security policy**
  • Ability to analyze public policy issues**
  • Ability to design and utilize research and analytical methods and techniques**
  • Ability to write in a public policy context**
  • Ability to work effectively in a high pressure environment
  • Ability to convey analysis and information orally through briefings, consultations and other presentations
  • Ability to work collaboratively with others
  • Ability to build and maintain a professional network
  • Ability to exercise objectivity in all phases of analysis and consultation
  • Ability to exercise judgment and discretion
  • Ability to communicate orally

.

HOW YOU WILL BE EVALUATED:

The Library of Congress evaluates applicants through an applicant questionnaire and a structured interview. Applicants may also be screened for some jobs through licensing, certification, and/or education requirements, a narrative/application review, and/or a preliminary telephone interview.

The knowledge, skills, and abilities (KSAs) that are marked with a double asterisk (**) in the vacancy announcement and the applicant questionnaire are considered the most critical for a position. To be considered for final selection, applicants must demonstrate fully acceptable experience in these designated KSAs in the narrative/application review, preliminary telephone and/or full structured interview.

The various assessment tools listed above are designed to verify or explore applicants’ experience, knowledge, and training directly related to the job in order to identify the best qualified applicants for selection.

To preview questions please click here.


BENEFITS:

Back to top

You can review our benefits at: http://www.loc.gov/hr/employment/index.php?action=cMain.showBenefits

OTHER INFORMATION:

The Congressional Research Service, within the Library of Congress, is part of the Legislative Branch of the federal government. As such, all positions are in the excepted service.

The salary range indicated reflects the locality pay adjustment for the Washington, D.C. metropolitan area. Although it is the Library’s policy to afford the maximum pay benefit to employees when setting rates of pay, a new appointee who has had no previous federal service will generally be paid the minimum step of the grade.

This is a non-supervisory, bargaining unit position.

The tour of duty for this position is full-time.

This vacancy will be filled in the GS-0101 (social science analyst) or GS-0110 (economist) job series. The position description numbers for this position are 4748 (GS-0101-13) and 4740 (GS-0110-13).

The incumbent of this position may elect to work a compflex or flexitime work schedule.

RELOCATION EXPENSES ARE NOT AUTHORIZED FOR THE PERSON(S) SELECTED UNDER THIS VACANCY ANNOUNCEMENT.

The Library reserves the right to fill a lesser or greater number of vacancies indicated during the life of this vacancy announcement.

Appointment/retention is subject to a favorable evaluation of an appropriate personnel security/suitability investigation.

Applicants who are referred for interview will be required to submit a completed OF-306, Declaration for Federal Employment.

Initial appointments, permanent or indefinite, to the Library of Congress require completion of a one-year probationary period.

This agency provides reasonable accommodations to applicants with disabilities. If you need a reasonable accommodation for any part of the application and hiring process, please notify this agency. The decision on granting reasonable accommodations will be made on a case-by-case basis.

Applicants with disabilities may be considered under special hiring procedures and must submit an appropriate certificate of eligibility when applying for this position. The certificate of disability may be issued by a State Vocational Rehabilitation Office, Disability Services or Career Services office of an applicant’s college or university, or the Department of Veterans Affairs. The date of certification must be within one year of the vacancy closing date and must be submitted with your application. For more information view the directive on the Library’s Selective Placement Program and/or contact the Library’s Office of Inclusiveness & Compliance at 202-707-6024 (voice or TTY) or email spp@loc.gov. FAILURE TO SUBMIT YOUR CERTIFICATION WILL CAUSE YOUR APPLICATION TO NOT BE CONSIDERED UNDER THE SELECTIVE PLACEMENT PROGRAM.

Are you a veteran? Please indicate the type of Veterans’ Preference you are claiming in your application materials and/or applicant profile and provide the appropriate supporting documentation to validate your claim. Those applying for 5-point preference must submit Member Copy 4 of your DD 214. Those applying for 10-point preference must fill out an SF-15, Application for 10-Point Veteran Preference, and provide the required documentation listed on the back of the form. For more information regarding eligibility requirements, please see the Library’s Merit Selection Plan, Section X.D. IF REQUIRED SUPPORTING DOCUMENTATION IS NOT ATTACHED, VETERANS’ PREFERENCE WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED IN THE APPLICATION PROCESS.


HOW TO APPLY:

Back to top

Please carefully follow all instructions below to ensure you are considered for the position.

You are required to apply online for this announcement. We are unable to accept mailed or emailed applications. To apply online, complete the following steps.

Step 1: Review the Job Announcement. We recommend you go to the end of the Qualifications and Evaluations section of the job announcement to preview the application questions that you will be required to answer.

Step 2: Click the “APPLY ONLINE” button to the right of this announcement. Follow USAJOBS’ instructions to access your account (if you do not have a USAJOBS account, you will be asked to build one). If you have not already created a resume in USAJOBS, you will be required to create one. Although you must enter your Social Security number for USAJOBS, this information will not be provided to the Congressional Research Service or the Library of Congress.

Step 3: USAJOBS will redirect you to the Library of Congress hiring management website, where you will complete the application process. Answer all questions honestly and thoroughly, and follow all instructions for uploading required documentation.

Step 4: Click “FINISH” after you have completed your application. Once you have submitted your application, you can check your status online through your USAJOBS account. Your complete online application must be received by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Standard Time (EST) on the closing date of the announcement.

If you are experiencing any technical difficulty with the online process, you MUST CONTACT THE POINT OF CONTACT FOR THIS ANNOUNCEMENT BEFORE THE CLOSING DATE. For all technical issues please contact jobhelp@loc.gov, no later than 4:30 p.m. EST of the Closing Date. REQUESTS FOR EXTENSIONS WILL NOT BE GRANTED.

REQUIRED DOCUMENTS:

Applicants who wish to be considered for the GS-0110 (economist) job series MUST SUBMIT legible copies of transcripts that verify completion at least one of the following BASIC REQUIREMENTS:

A. Degree in economics that included at least 21 semester hours in economics and 3 semester hours in statistics, accounting, or calculus;

OR

B. A combination of education and experience: courses equivalent to a major in economics, as shown in A. above, plus appropriate experience or additional education.

Applicants who do not submit transcripts supporting their eligibility for the GS-0110 (economist) job series at the time of application will be considered for the GS-0101 (social science analyst) job series. Photocopies of transcripts, copies downloaded from the university website, or a self-generated list of courses with grades and credits (indicate quarter/semester hours, names of all colleges and universities attended including city, state, major(s) and type and year of degree(s) received) are sufficient at the application stage. Official transcripts will be required if selected.

Current or former federal employees must submit their most recent Notification of Personnel Action (SF-50 or equivalent).

Disabled applicants claiming Selective Placement eligibility must submit the appropriate supporting documentation described in OTHER INFORMATION above. If this required documentation is not attached, your application will not be considered under the Selective Placement Program.

Veterans claiming Veterans’ Preference eligibility must submit the appropriate supporting documentation described in OTHER INFORMATION above. If this required documentation is not attached, Veterans’ Preference will not be applied to your application.

AGENCY CONTACT INFO:

Customer Service Center
Phone: 202-707-5627
Fax: 000-000-0000
Email: JobHelp@loc.gov
Agency Information:
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
101 Independence Ave. SE
LM-107
Washington, DC
20540
US
Fax: 000-000-0000

WHAT TO EXPECT NEXT:

Please review our evaluation process under Evaluation. You may check the status of your application for this position at any time by logging onto the USAJOBS “My USAJOBS” tab and clicking “My Applications.” You will receive final notification via e-mail when the vacancy has been filled.

 

« Older Posts
Skip to toolbar
  • Log In