Rhetoric & Technical Communication
Rhetoric & Technical Communication
Aaron A. Toscano, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Dept. of English

Resources and Daily Activities

  • Charlotte Debate
  • Conference Presentations
    • Critical Theory/MRG 2023 Presentation
    • PCA/ACA Conference Presentation 2022
    • PCAS/ACAS 2024 Presentation
    • PCAS/ACAS Presentation 2021
    • SAMLA 2024 Presentation
    • SEACS 2021 Presentation
    • SEACS 2022 Presentation
    • SEACS 2023 Presentation
    • SEACS 2024 Presentation
    • SEACS 2025 Presentation
    • SEWSA 2021 Presentation
    • South Atlantic MLA Conference 2022
  • Dr. Toscano’s Homepage
  • ENGL 2116-014: Introduction to Technical Communication
    • April 10th: Analyzing Ethics
      • Ethical Dilemmas for Homework
      • Ethical Dilemmas to Ponder
      • Mapping Our Personal Ethics
    • April 12th: Writing Ethically
    • April 17th: Ethics Continued
    • April 19th: More on Ethics in Writing and Professional Contexts
    • April 24th: Mastering Oral Presentations
    • April 3rd: Research Fun
    • April 5th: More Research Fun
      • Epistemology and Other Fun Research Ideas
      • Research
    • February 13th: Introduction to User Design
    • February 15th: Instructions for Users
      • Making Résumés and Cover Letters More Effective
    • February 1st: Reflection on Workplace Messages
    • February 20th: The Rhetoric of Technology
    • February 22nd: Social Constructions of Technology
    • February 6th: Plain Language
    • January 11th: More Introduction to Class
    • January 18th: Audience & Purpose
    • January 23rd: Résumés and Cover Letters
      • Duty Format for Résumés
      • Peter Profit’s Cover Letter
    • January 25th: More on Résumés and Cover Letters
    • January 30th: Achieving a Readable Style
      • Euphemisms
      • Prose Practice for Next Class
      • Prose Revision Assignment
      • Revising Prose: Efficiency, Accuracy, and Good
      • Sentence Clarity
    • January 9th: Introduction to the Class
    • Major Assignments
    • March 13th: Introduction to Information Design
    • March 15th: More on Information Design
    • March 20th: Reporting Technical Information
    • March 27th: The Great I, Robot Analysis
    • May 1st: Final Portfolio Requirements
  • ENGL 4182/5182: Information Design & Digital Publishing
    • August 21st: Introduction to the Course
      • Rhetorical Principles of Information Design
    • August 28th: Introduction to Information Design
      • Prejudice and Rhetoric
      • Robin Williams’s Principles of Design
    • Classmates Webpages (Fall 2017)
    • December 4th: Presentations
    • Major Assignments for ENGL 4182/5182 (Fall 2017)
    • November 13th: More on Color
      • Designing with Color
      • Important Images
    • November 20th: Extra-Textual Elements
    • November 27th: Presentation/Portfolio Workshop
    • November 6th: In Living Color
    • October 16th: Type Fever
      • Typography
    • October 23rd: More on Type
    • October 2nd: MIDTERM FUN!!!
    • October 30th: Working with Graphics
      • Beerknurd Calendar 2018
    • September 11th: Talking about Design without Using “Thingy”
      • Theory, theory, practice
    • September 18th: The Whole Document
    • September 25th: Page Design
  • ENGL 4183/5183: Editing with Digital Technologies
    • August 23rd: Introduction to the Class
    • August 30th: Rhetoric, Words, and Composing
    • December 6th: Words and Word Classes
    • Major Assignments for ENGL 4183/5183 (Fall 2023)
    • November 15th: Cohesive Rhythm
    • November 1st: Stylistic Variations
    • November 29th: Voice and Other Nebulous Writing Terms
      • Rhetoric of Fear (prose example)
    • November 8th: Rhetorical Effects of Punctuation
    • October 11th: Choosing Adjectivals
    • October 18th: Choosing Nominals
    • October 4th: Form and Function
    • September 13th: Verb is the Word!
    • September 27th: Coordination and Subordination
      • Parallelism
    • September 6th: Sentence Patterns
  • ENGL 4275/WRDS 4011: “Rhetoric of Technology”
    • April 23rd: Presentation Discussion
    • April 2nd: Artificial Intelligence Discussion, machine (super)learning
    • April 4th: Writing and Reflecting Discussion
    • April 9th: Tom Wheeler’s The History of Our Future (Part I)
    • February 13th: Religion of Technology Part 3 of 3
    • February 15th: Is Love a Technology?
    • February 1st: Technology and Postmodernism
    • February 20th: Technology and Gender
    • February 22nd: Technology, Expediency, Racism
    • February 27th: Writing Workshop, etc.
    • February 6th: The Religion of Technology (Part 1 of 3)
    • February 8th: Religion of Technology (Part 2 of 3)
    • January 11th: Introduction to the Course
    • January 16th: Isaac Asimov’s “Cult of Ignorance”
    • January 18th: Technology and Meaning, a Humanist perspective
    • January 23rd: Technology and Democracy
    • January 25th: The Politics of Technology
    • January 30th: Discussion on Writing as Thinking
    • Major Assignments for Rhetoric of Technology
    • March 12th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 1 of 3
    • March 14th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 2 of 3
    • March 19th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 3 of 3
    • March 21st: Writing and Reflecting: Research and Synthesizing
    • March 26th: Artificial Intelligence and Risk
    • March 28th: Artificial Intelligence Book Reviews
  • ENGL 6166: Rhetorical Theory
    • April 11th: Knoblauch. Ch. 4 and Ch. 5
    • April 18th: Feminisms, Rhetorics, Herstories
    • April 25th:  Knoblauch. Ch. 6, 7, and “Afterword”
    • April 4th: Jacques Derrida’s Positions
    • February 15th: St. Augustine’s On Christian Doctrine [Rhetoric]
    • February 1st: Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 2 & 3
      • Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 2
      • Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 3
    • February 22nd: Knoblauch. Ch. 1 and 2
    • February 29th: Descartes, Rene, Discourse on Method
    • February 8th: Isocrates
    • January 11th: Introduction to Class
    • January 18th: Plato’s Phaedrus
    • January 25th: Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 1
    • March 14th: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women
    • March 21st: Feminist Rhetoric(s)
    • March 28th: Knoblauch’s Ch. 3 and More Constitutive Rhetoric
    • Rhetorical Theory Assignments
  • ENGL/COMM/WRDS: The Rhetoric of Fear
    • April 11th: McCarthyism Part 1
    • April 18th: McCarthyism Part 2
    • April 25th: The Satanic Panic
    • April 4th: Suspense/Horror/Fear in Film
    • February 14th: Fascism and Other Valentine’s Day Atrocities
    • February 21st: Fascism Part 2
    • February 7th: Fallacies Part 3 and American Politics Part 2
    • January 10th: Introduction to the Class
    • January 17th: Scapegoats & Conspiracies
    • January 24th: The Rhetoric of Fear and Fallacies Part 1
    • January 31st: Fallacies Part 2 and American Politics Part 1
    • Major Assignments
    • March 28th: Nineteen Eighty-Four
    • March 7th: Fascism Part 3
    • May 2nd: The Satanic Panic Part II
      • Rhetoric of Fear and Job Losses
  • Intercultural Communication on the Amalfi Coast
    • Pedagogical Theory for Study Abroad
  • LBST 2213-110: Science, Technology, and Society
    • August 22nd: Science and Technology from a Humanistic Perspective
    • August 24th: Science and Technology, a Humanistic Approach
    • August 29th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 2
    • August 31st: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 3 and 4
    • December 5th: Video Games and Violence, a more nuanced view
    • November 14th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes. (1964) Ch. 27-end
    • November 16th: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Preface-Ch. 8
    • November 21st: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Ch. 9-Ch. 16
    • November 28th: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ch. 17-Ch. 24
    • November 30th: Violence in Video Games
    • November 7th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes Ch. 1-17
    • November 9th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes, Ch. 18-26
    • October 12th: Lies Economics Tells
    • October 17th: Brief Histories of Medicine, Salerno, and Galen
    • October 19th: Politicizing Science and Medicine
    • October 24th: COVID-19 Facial Covering Rhetoric
    • October 26th: Wells, H. G. Time Machine. Ch. 1-5
    • October 31st: Wells, H. G. The Time Machine Ch. 6-The End
    • October 3rd: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 7 and Conclusion
    • September 12th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 7 and Conclusion
    • September 19th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Prefaces and Ch. 1
    • September 26th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 2
    • September 28th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 5 and 6
    • September 7th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 5 and 6
  • New Media: Gender, Culture, Technology
    • August 19: Introduction to the Course
    • August 21: More Introduction
    • August 26th: Consider Media-ted Arguments
    • August 28th: Media & American Culture
    • November 13th: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 3
    • November 18th: Feminism’s Non-Monolithic Nature
    • November 20th: Compulsory Heterosexuality
    • November 25th: Presentation Discussion
    • November 4: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 1
    • November 6: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 2
    • October 16th: No Class Meeting
    • October 21: Misunderstanding the Internet, Part 1
    • October 23: Misunderstanding the Internet, Part 2
    • October 28: The Internet, Part 3
    • October 2nd: Hauntology
    • October 30th: Social Construction of Sexuality
    • October 7:  Myth in American Culture
    • September 11: Critical Theory
    • September 16th: Social Construction of Gender and Sexuality
    • September 18th: Postmodernism, Part 1
    • September 23rd: Postmodernism, Part 2
    • September 25th: Postmodernism, Part 3
    • September 30th: Capitalist Realism
    • September 4th: The Medium is the Message!
    • September 9: The Public Sphere
  • Science Fiction and American Culture
    • April 10th: Octavia Butler’s Dawn (Parts III and IV)
    • April 15th: The Dispossessed (Part I)
    • April 17th: The Dispossessed (Part II)
    • April 1st: Interstellar (2014)
    • April 22nd: In/Human Beauty
    • April 24: Witch Hunt Politics (Part I)
    • April 29th: Witch Hunt Politics (Part II)
    • April 3rd: Catch Up and Start Octavia Butler
    • April 8th: Octavia Butler’s Dawn (Parts I and II)
    • February 11: William Gibson, Part II
    • February 18: Use Your Illusion I
    • February 20: Use Your Illusion II
    • February 25th: Firefly and Black Mirror
    • February 4th: Writing Discussion: Ideas & Arguments
    • February 6th: William Gibson, Part I
    • January 14th: Introduction to to “Science Fiction and American Culture”
    • January 16th: More Introduction
    • January 21st: Robots and Zombies
    • January 23rd: Gender Studies and Science Fiction
    • January 28th: American Studies Introduction
    • January 30th: World’s Beyond
    • March 11th: All Systems Red
    • March 13th: Zone One (Part 1)
      • Zone One “Friday”
    • March 18th: Zone One, “Saturday”
    • March 20th: Zone One, “Sunday”
    • March 25th: Synthesizing Sources; Writing Gooder
      • Writing Discussion–Outlines
    • March 27th: Inception (2010)
  • Teaching Portfolio
  • Topics for Analysis
    • A Practical Editing Situation
    • American Culture, an Introduction
    • Cultural Studies and Science Fiction Films
    • Efficiency in Writing Reviews
    • Feminism, An Introduction
    • Fordism/Taylorism
    • Frankenstein Part I
    • Frankenstein Part II
    • Futurism Introduction
    • How to Lie with Statistics
    • How to Make an Argument with Sources
    • Isaac Asimov’s “A Cult of Ignorance”
    • Judith Butler, an Introduction to Gender/Sexuality Studies
    • Langdon Winner Summary: The Politics of Technology
    • Oral Presentations
    • Oratory and Argument Analysis
    • Our Public Sphere
    • Postmodernism Introduction
    • Protesting Confederate Place
    • Punctuation Refresher
    • QT, the Existential Robot
    • Religion of Technology Discussion
    • Rhetoric, an Introduction
      • Analyzing the Culture of Technical Writer Ads
      • Rhetoric of Technology
      • Visual Culture
      • Visual Perception
      • Visual Perception, Culture, and Rhetoric
      • Visual Rhetoric
      • Visuals for Technical Communication
      • World War I Propaganda
    • The Great I, Robot Discussion
      • I, Robot Short Essay Topics
    • The Rhetoric of Video Games: A Cultural Perspective
      • Civilization, an Analysis
    • The Sopranos
    • Why Science Fiction?
    • Zombies and Consumption Satire
  • Video Games & American Culture
    • April 14th: Phallocentrism
    • April 21st: Video Games and Neoliberalism
    • April 7th: Video Games and Conquest
    • Assignments for Video Games & American Culture
    • February 10th: Aesthetics and Culture
    • February 17th: Narrative and Catharsis
    • February 24th: Serious Games
    • February 3rd: More History of Video Games
    • January 13th: Introduction to the course
    • January 20th: Introduction to Video Game Studies
    • January 27th: Games & Culture
      • Marxism for Video Game Analysis
      • Postmodernism for Video Game Analysis
    • March 24th: Realism, Interpretation(s), and Meaning Making
    • March 31st: Feminist Perspectives and Politics
    • March 3rd: Risky Business?

Contact Me

Office: Fretwell 255F
Email: atoscano@uncc.edu
Science Fiction and American Culture » January 23rd: Gender Studies and Science Fiction

January 23rd: Gender Studies and Science Fiction

Don’t forget the Weekly Discussion #1 and #2 are due tonight (1/23) at 11:00pm.

Announcements

  • Charlotte Motor Speechway
    Saturday & Sunday (1/25-1/26), 9am-5pm
    Mebane and CHHS
  • Charlotte Debate practice
    Tuesdays, 5:30pm-6:30pm
    Fretwell 219

Plan for Today

  • Last bit on being a self-made person
  • Politics of Technology
  • Science Fiction and Dreams
  • Postmodernism (arguments)
  • Gender Studies

Gender Studies and Absolutes

This subject is going to be difficult for many of us. We tend to live in a binary world: right and wrong, black and white, us and them, male and female…we have little patience to contemplate ambiguity, especially when it’s as “fundamental” as gender. The attributes and behaviors of men and women, our gender roles, seem to be essential to what’s masculine and feminine. If something violates our assumptions, at best, we think it odd, and, at worst, we hate it. Having absolutes is comfortable to us because we don’t like to have our worldviews predicated on shaky assumptions.

Voltaire has a nice quote to contemplate: “Doubt is not a pleasant condition, but certainty is absurd.”

Unfortunately, ambiguity, doubt, and relativity are cultural conditions. We might try to ignore that or even avoid those in favor of our concrete perspectives, which are often un-examined convictions. In a class like this one that covers how culture influences the texts we read (and their creation), no absolute should remain unquestioned.

Gender is such an absolute that many don’t want questioned: men are men; women are women…why? Before we get farther into the discussion, let’s define some words:

  • Feminism: the social and political philosophy advocating the equality of all people regardless of gender.
  • Patriarchy: male dominated society; the powerful group in a society elevates male privilege and subordinates women.
  • Sexism: attitudes, assumptions, and stereotypes directed at a particular sex/gender; especially when these are related to women.*
  • Heteronormativity: the attitude that recognizes heterosexual relationships as the societal norm and ignores other possibilities.
  • Heterosexist: the belief that the only valid form of relationship is the heterosexual union between a man and a woman.
  • Phallocentrism: power is held and wielded by those in control of the phallus, the site of male power; male superiority based on the legitimate use of the phallus.
  • Exogamy: practice of marrying outside one’s group (family, culture, “race,” species–this is a Sci Fi class. Btw, who’s seen The Shape of Water? Great film).

*There is a theory that only men can be sexist in patriarchal society because sexism is systemic–it’s part of the culture, part of the system and pervasive. There is no female equivalent to sexism, no reverse sexism, because a subordinate group doesn’t have the same prevailing power privilege. Similarly, there is a theory that only white people can be racist because racism is systemic in “white supremacist” society. These are prevailing academic theories, and I make no requirement that you accept them–only that you understand the position. (c.f. Charlotte Debate)

As an introduction, let’s look at a scene from ABC’s Modern Family (S04 Ep20) that can have multiple readings (interpretations). On the surface, it’s a funny story and a leading character triumphs. Below the surface, it’s a trite display of gender roles and gendered value in patriarchal culture. For a brief context, Gloria feels inferior to her ex-husband’s fiancée because she’s very well educated, calm, and a successful career woman. She has a Ph.D and “[is] able to bond with Manny on his intellectual level in a way that neither Jay nor Gloria could — or really showed any interest in doing. Because of this, Gloria quickly found herself intimidated and jealous of this woman” (Hughes). This threatens Gloria because she feels Manny (her son) will look up to the new stepmom more than her.  Check out Gloria meeting Javier’s fiancee. If we’ve got time, let’s check out Jay getting Gloria new shoes. (By the way, Joe Manganiello and Joe Gonzalez are Sofia Vergara’s actual ex-husbands…)

Questions–Trish, the fiancée, sees the relationship dynamic differently from Gloria.

  • What motivates Trish’s reasons for locking herself in the room?
  • This comes at the end of the show, so what does the “resolution” value in femininity?
  • Is there a comment about a woman’s proper role?

Edward Said’s Orientalism

No, I didn’t assign this book, but a it is important for today’s readings and others in the future. Edward Said was a Palestinian American cultural critic. His book and scholars’ using his work have some important passages for our discussion. This is only a beginning look at what’s called postcolonialism.

…the Orient has helped to define Europe (or the West) as its contrasting image, idea, personality, experience. (1-2)

Orientalism is a style of thought based upon an ontological and epistemological distinction between “the Orient” and (most of the time) “the occident.” Thus a very large mass of writers, among whom are poets, novelists, philosophers, political theorists, economists, and imperial administrators, have accepted the basic distinction between East and West as the starting point for elaborate theories, epics, novels, social descriptions, and political accounts concerning the Orient, its people, “mind,” destiny, and so on. (2-3)

Said, Edward. Orientalism. 1978. Vintage Books, 1979.

This process is responsible for the reproduction of the Orient, a reproduction based on an initial distinction (West/Orient) and the values (positive/negative) associated with it. The Orient becomes accessible to the West precisely because the West invests resources in acquiring knowledge (details about institutions, languages, religions, history, customs) and telling stories (novels, dramas, scientific treatises, anthropological works, business brochures) about the Oriental ‘object’. To quote Said again: “Continued investment made Orientalism, as a system of knowledge about the Orient, an accepted grid for filtering through the Orient into western consciousness” [6]. (Schirato 46)

Schirato, Tony. “The Narrative of Orientalism,” Southeast Asian Journal of Social Science, vol. 22, no. 1, 1994, pp. 44-52. https://www.jstor.org/stable/24491918

For more information, I recommend Edward Said’s seminal text Orientalism, but here’s a quicker discussion from teenVogue., which I include as representative of contemporary critiques of “cultural appropriation.” The author’s argument is on how Western power affected the “East.”

Although “oriental” is a unartful, passé term, many scholars recognize Said’s use of “orientalism” as a critique of the stereotyping and violence of the West on the East. It is imperative that you scrutinize and find problems with the assumption of a definitive East-West binary. Remember, Said’s critique is of the ways Eurocentric values and epistemology frame or other Eastern cultures. Said went to preeminent Western, Ivy League Schools: Princeton (BA) and Harvard (MA & PhD).

1972: Historical Context

Today’s stories were both published in 1972 during the apex of second-wave feminism. The landmark (now defunct) Supreme Court decision of Roe v. Wade was in 1973. Many legal roadblocks to women’s full participation were being struck down during this time–but none of this was overnight. Although that movement has been criticized as “white middle-class women’s feminism,” it promoted many ideas that were outside mainstream patriarchy, including questions of gender. The stories are products of the time period because they invert (or attempt to invert) the traditional male perspective, which dominated science fiction and nearly all media. The slogan a woman without a man is like a fish without a bicycle, coined by Australian feminist and anti-nuclear activist Irina Dunn in 1970, might be relevnat to Joanna Russ’s short story that speculates on what a world of women would be like and their first contact with men.

Tiptree’s short story, while commenting on gender relations of the time period, is a different kind of “alien” contact. It might help to think about the story in terms of men being away from home working on an oil rig or distant location. What do the women on the space station do? What is the gender of the narrator (the reporter)?

James Tiptree, Jr./Alice B. Sheldon “And I Awoke and Found Me Here on the Cold Hill’s Side” (1972)

Alice B. Sheldon was pretty ahead of her time. She was promoted to the rank of Major in Army Air Force Intelligence and worked with (most likely) spy photos (1942-1946). She was also in the CIA from 1952-1955, but left to go back to college, and in 1967, she earned a PhD in experimental psychology and studied animal behavior. Although we can’t read an author’s work as a pseudo-biography, she was a very smart person who saw the world in complicated ways. As the editors of The Wesleyan Anthology of Science Fiction note, sexuality is a major theme of her work (517). She would definitely not subscribe to a binary but, rather, a spectrum of sexuality.

Clearly, humans aren’t in control in her short story. They appear to be obsessed with aliens and alien sexuality or, more accurately, the mystique of alien sexuality. Tiptree plays on the situation of eroticizing the “other.” There is a long history of Western culture having a fetish for those from other cultures. The space dock worker waiting for his wife even mentions “the Polynesians” to refer to the way a culture has been exploited and eroticized by a colonial power (pp. 522-523). Even today, consumerist culture sexualizes caricatures of indigenous women.

Let’s take a look at some main passages from the short story:

  • p. 518: Wristwatches on spaceships.
    • Past technologies will show up in scifi texts in interesting ways.
    • Notice the manuals in Isaac Asimov stories (later).
  • p. 518: “Go home,” he mumbled. “Go home and make babies. While you still can.”
    • Compare to these lines:
    • p. 519: “‘News,’ he said. ‘A message for the eager, hopeful human race. A word about those lovely, lovable aliens we all love so much.’ He looked at me. ‘Shocked, aren’t you, newsboy?'”
    • p. 521: “‘Go home, boy. Go home to your version of Burned Barn . . .”
  • p. 519: “I had him figured out now. A xenophobe. Aliens plot to take over Earth.” {Is that what the “red-haired man” is? Didn’t he seem a bit more xenophile?}
  • p. 519: “Little Junction,” dive bar in DC.
  • p. 520: Aliens as celebrities
  • p. 522: “Man is in love and loves what vanishes…”
    • Let’s unpack this because it relates to the poem.
    • Every heard the idea that you love what you can’t have?
    • Why not love what’s easy?
  • p. 523: “Man is exogamous–all our history is one long drive to find and impregnate the stranger.”
    • Interpret this from an imperialist lens.
    • Why the lament?
  • p. 524: “The station employs only happily wedded couples” most likely because they need the stability of marriage to keep the humans from going bonkers over the aliens. If they stray, they could disrupt the station’s business.

Here’s Diva Plavalaguna from The Fifth Element (1997). What’s going on in this scene? Also, do you remember what the fifth element is supposed to be?

John Keat’s “La Belle Dame sans Merci”

I guess being an English professor means I have to explain the reference to Keats’s poem “La Belle Dame sans Merci” (“The Beautiful Lady without Pity”…google translate used to claim it was “without thank you”). Of course, full disclosure, you know I’m not really that kind of English Professor, but I’ll wear that hat for a little while and explicate the poem…to a certain extent.

  • This poem is about a young man deserted and left bereft by a mysterious and magical lover.
  • The poem also could be a lament that the women died. Why are there so many narratives by men who seem to long for the perfect women?
  • Possibly a femme fatale, who seduces men and then destroys them.
  • Just found this on Facebook:

This poem’s title was also inspired by an earlier poem: Alain Chartier‘s La Belle Dame sans Mercy, which is about courtly love.

Love, an Illusion

I asked you to contemplate what is love (after I told you it doesn’t exist). This short story might be better thought of as dealing with irrational emotions like “lust” or “obsession,” but love, too, is an emotion, so there’s a subjective component. Because we can’t hold love or bottle it, we sell proxies, such as cards, chocolates, jewelry, etc.. Although the State codifies partner servitude in marriage laws, there are (sometimes much stronger) cultural mores around marriage. The space dock worker in the short story is lamenting his past through a tale of searching for the quintessential object of desire, a search doomed to fail. As the Keat’s poem demonstrates, love is fleeting. Just ask Link about his quests for Zelda.

Psychoanalysis

In a different class, we’d probably discuss the Freudian stuff going on in this short story. Later in the semester, we’ll return to this topic, but we’ll set it aside for now. However, you probably notice the fetishization of aliens and the engineer’s libido. If we have some time, we can discuss (briefly as an introduction) libido and death instinct from Freud. How does the engineer appear to discuss his plight to have sex with the aliens? Is it a happy attempt at courtship? Wouldn’t it be easier to swipe right?

Joanna Russ’s “When it Changed” (1972)

Joanna Russ creates an all-female imagined world for us to think about gender roles. This all-female world has lived without men for centuries on the planet Whileaway. The main characters rush to meet the alien men who arrive…the women aren’t necessarily welcoming to the outsiders. As you read, consider how Russ portrays the men. The women aren’t impressed with them as macho astronauts, intrepid pioneers. Why? Why might they not be impressed with men in uniforms?

Russ wrote the novel The Female Man (1975) after this short story. It is out-of-this-world! The basic plot is the lives of four women thrust together from different time periods and world’s:

  • Joanna (not hard to figure out who this represents…) is from the 1970s Earth.
  • Jeannine is from an alternate past of the 1930s.
  • Janet is Whileaway, and the novel is written from her perspective.
  • Jael is from a different universe where a literal battle of the sexes is waged.

Social Construction of Beauty/Attractiveness

Even the words above are gendered to an extent. We usually don’t identify men as “beautiful,” but we interchange “beautiful” and “attractive” for women. Some might say a landscape or poem is “beautifully” written, which could led us into a deeper discussion on the word’s usage. For now, let’s concentrate on the ways Russ portrays the Whileawayans and the Earthmen.

  • “Men! Yuki screamed….”They’ve come back! Real Earth men!” (p. 509) Yuki exclaimed, “I thought they would be good-looking!” (p. 510)
    Later, Yuki’s excitement goes away when asked if she could fall in love with a man: “With a ten-foot toad!” (p. 514)
  • Janet sizes them up: “They are bigger than we are. They are bigger and broader. Two were taller than me, and I am extremely tall, one meter eighty centimeters [5’9″] in my bare feet. They are obviously of our species but off, indescribably off, and as my eyes could not and still cannot quite comprehend the lines of those alien bodies, I could not, then, bring myself to touch them.” (509)
  • What’s the role of violence on Whileaway?

Gender Roles and Stereotypes

This story imagines a world where the binary division between masculine and feminine is absent. Unlike stories of all-female worlds written by men, such as, Anderson’s Virgin Planet (1959), “When it Changed” envisions a world where women aren’t longing for the male other. In many stories, a male protagonist is used to save women–from a dragon, a band of savages, King Koopa, etc.–but Whileawayans need no saving because they’re doing fine. Clearly, Whileaway is on the verge of change, and Russ, writing in the early 1970s, was influenced by the effects of the sexual revolution and counter culture movements. I would be shortsighted to claim that those cultural events died by the 1980s, but there was definitely a return to more puritanical mores. The epidemic of STDs in the late 1970s and 1980s put a huge taboo on what was seen as reckless sexual behavior, and the rise of conservatism and right-wing religious clout in politics quelled much of the fervor of 1960s liberation. Then again, maybe the 1960s couldn’t sustain its revolution because it still operated under phallocentric assumptions. Heteronormativity is the dominant familial condition replicated in most cultures today.

Janet’s statement: “I doubt very much that sexual equality has been reestablished on Earth” (514). Maybe Russ is commenting on the fact that men in patriarchal culture think there’s equality, but, being from a position of privilege, they can’t see inequality. This situation is referred to as “male privilege.”

What’s in a Name?

Janet tells readers at the end of the story that Whileaway used to be called For-A-While before the men were killed off by disease. What’s the significance of the names in relation to the story’s title?

  • What does it mean to whileaway your time?
  • Consider the line “All good things must come to an end.”
  • “Faust’s words: Verweile doch, du bist so schoen! Keep it as it is. Don’t change.”
  • Usually translated as “Stay a while, you are so beautiful”
    • Faust made a deal with the devil, so wanting a moment to last forever is futile.

Next Class

We’ll catch up on anything we didn’t get to from this week before moving onto an American Studies discussion. We’ll discuss The Declaration of Independence and Federalist Papers 10, 51, and 78. Of course, don’t forget to do the Weekly Discussion posts #1 & #2 before Thursday at 11:00pm.

Skip to toolbar
  • Log In