Rhetoric & Technical Communication
Rhetoric & Technical Communication
Aaron A. Toscano, Ph.D., Associate Professor, Dept. of English

Resources and Daily Activities

  • Charlotte Debate
  • Conference Presentations
    • Critical Theory/MRG 2023 Presentation
    • PCA/ACA Conference Presentation 2022
    • PCAS/ACAS 2024 Presentation
    • PCAS/ACAS Presentation 2021
    • SAMLA 2024 Presentation
    • SEACS 2021 Presentation
    • SEACS 2022 Presentation
    • SEACS 2023 Presentation
    • SEACS 2024 Presentation
    • SEACS 2025 Presentation
    • SEWSA 2021 Presentation
    • South Atlantic MLA Conference 2022
  • Dr. Toscano’s Homepage
  • ENGL 2116-014: Introduction to Technical Communication
    • April 10th: Analyzing Ethics
      • Ethical Dilemmas for Homework
      • Ethical Dilemmas to Ponder
      • Mapping Our Personal Ethics
    • April 12th: Writing Ethically
    • April 17th: Ethics Continued
    • April 19th: More on Ethics in Writing and Professional Contexts
    • April 24th: Mastering Oral Presentations
    • April 3rd: Research Fun
    • April 5th: More Research Fun
      • Epistemology and Other Fun Research Ideas
      • Research
    • February 13th: Introduction to User Design
    • February 15th: Instructions for Users
      • Making Résumés and Cover Letters More Effective
    • February 1st: Reflection on Workplace Messages
    • February 20th: The Rhetoric of Technology
    • February 22nd: Social Constructions of Technology
    • February 6th: Plain Language
    • January 11th: More Introduction to Class
    • January 18th: Audience & Purpose
    • January 23rd: Résumés and Cover Letters
      • Duty Format for Résumés
      • Peter Profit’s Cover Letter
    • January 25th: More on Résumés and Cover Letters
    • January 30th: Achieving a Readable Style
      • Euphemisms
      • Prose Practice for Next Class
      • Prose Revision Assignment
      • Revising Prose: Efficiency, Accuracy, and Good
      • Sentence Clarity
    • January 9th: Introduction to the Class
    • Major Assignments
    • March 13th: Introduction to Information Design
    • March 15th: More on Information Design
    • March 20th: Reporting Technical Information
    • March 27th: The Great I, Robot Analysis
    • May 1st: Final Portfolio Requirements
  • ENGL 4182/5182: Information Design & Digital Publishing
    • August 21st: Introduction to the Course
      • Rhetorical Principles of Information Design
    • August 28th: Introduction to Information Design
      • Prejudice and Rhetoric
      • Robin Williams’s Principles of Design
    • Classmates Webpages (Fall 2017)
    • December 4th: Presentations
    • Major Assignments for ENGL 4182/5182 (Fall 2017)
    • November 13th: More on Color
      • Designing with Color
      • Important Images
    • November 20th: Extra-Textual Elements
    • November 27th: Presentation/Portfolio Workshop
    • November 6th: In Living Color
    • October 16th: Type Fever
      • Typography
    • October 23rd: More on Type
    • October 2nd: MIDTERM FUN!!!
    • October 30th: Working with Graphics
      • Beerknurd Calendar 2018
    • September 11th: Talking about Design without Using “Thingy”
      • Theory, theory, practice
    • September 18th: The Whole Document
    • September 25th: Page Design
  • ENGL 4183/5183: Editing with Digital Technologies
    • August 23rd: Introduction to the Class
    • August 30th: Rhetoric, Words, and Composing
    • December 6th: Words and Word Classes
    • Major Assignments for ENGL 4183/5183 (Fall 2023)
    • November 15th: Cohesive Rhythm
    • November 1st: Stylistic Variations
    • November 29th: Voice and Other Nebulous Writing Terms
      • Rhetoric of Fear (prose example)
    • November 8th: Rhetorical Effects of Punctuation
    • October 11th: Choosing Adjectivals
    • October 18th: Choosing Nominals
    • October 4th: Form and Function
    • September 13th: Verb is the Word!
    • September 27th: Coordination and Subordination
      • Parallelism
    • September 6th: Sentence Patterns
  • ENGL 4275/WRDS 4011: “Rhetoric of Technology”
    • April 23rd: Presentation Discussion
    • April 2nd: Artificial Intelligence Discussion, machine (super)learning
    • April 4th: Writing and Reflecting Discussion
    • April 9th: Tom Wheeler’s The History of Our Future (Part I)
    • February 13th: Religion of Technology Part 3 of 3
    • February 15th: Is Love a Technology?
    • February 1st: Technology and Postmodernism
    • February 20th: Technology and Gender
    • February 22nd: Technology, Expediency, Racism
    • February 27th: Writing Workshop, etc.
    • February 6th: The Religion of Technology (Part 1 of 3)
    • February 8th: Religion of Technology (Part 2 of 3)
    • January 11th: Introduction to the Course
    • January 16th: Isaac Asimov’s “Cult of Ignorance”
    • January 18th: Technology and Meaning, a Humanist perspective
    • January 23rd: Technology and Democracy
    • January 25th: The Politics of Technology
    • January 30th: Discussion on Writing as Thinking
    • Major Assignments for Rhetoric of Technology
    • March 12th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 1 of 3
    • March 14th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 2 of 3
    • March 19th: Neuromancer (1984) Day 3 of 3
    • March 21st: Writing and Reflecting: Research and Synthesizing
    • March 26th: Artificial Intelligence and Risk
    • March 28th: Artificial Intelligence Book Reviews
  • ENGL 6166: Rhetorical Theory
    • April 11th: Knoblauch. Ch. 4 and Ch. 5
    • April 18th: Feminisms, Rhetorics, Herstories
    • April 25th:  Knoblauch. Ch. 6, 7, and “Afterword”
    • April 4th: Jacques Derrida’s Positions
    • February 15th: St. Augustine’s On Christian Doctrine [Rhetoric]
    • February 1st: Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 2 & 3
      • Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 2
      • Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 3
    • February 22nd: Knoblauch. Ch. 1 and 2
    • February 29th: Descartes, Rene, Discourse on Method
    • February 8th: Isocrates
    • January 11th: Introduction to Class
    • January 18th: Plato’s Phaedrus
    • January 25th: Aristotle’s On Rhetoric, Book 1
    • March 14th: Mary Wollstonecraft’s A Vindication of the Rights of Women
    • March 21st: Feminist Rhetoric(s)
    • March 28th: Knoblauch’s Ch. 3 and More Constitutive Rhetoric
    • Rhetorical Theory Assignments
  • ENGL/COMM/WRDS: The Rhetoric of Fear
    • April 11th: McCarthyism Part 1
    • April 18th: McCarthyism Part 2
    • April 25th: The Satanic Panic
    • April 4th: Suspense/Horror/Fear in Film
    • February 14th: Fascism and Other Valentine’s Day Atrocities
    • February 21st: Fascism Part 2
    • February 7th: Fallacies Part 3 and American Politics Part 2
    • January 10th: Introduction to the Class
    • January 17th: Scapegoats & Conspiracies
    • January 24th: The Rhetoric of Fear and Fallacies Part 1
    • January 31st: Fallacies Part 2 and American Politics Part 1
    • Major Assignments
    • March 28th: Nineteen Eighty-Four
    • March 7th: Fascism Part 3
    • May 2nd: The Satanic Panic Part II
      • Rhetoric of Fear and Job Losses
  • Intercultural Communication on the Amalfi Coast
    • Pedagogical Theory for Study Abroad
  • LBST 2213-110: Science, Technology, and Society
    • August 22nd: Science and Technology from a Humanistic Perspective
    • August 24th: Science and Technology, a Humanistic Approach
    • August 29th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 2
    • August 31st: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 3 and 4
    • December 5th: Video Games and Violence, a more nuanced view
    • November 14th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes. (1964) Ch. 27-end
    • November 16th: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Preface-Ch. 8
    • November 21st: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. 1818. Ch. 9-Ch. 16
    • November 28th: Shelley, Mary. Frankenstein. Ch. 17-Ch. 24
    • November 30th: Violence in Video Games
    • November 7th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes Ch. 1-17
    • November 9th: Boulle, Pierre. Planet of the Apes, Ch. 18-26
    • October 12th: Lies Economics Tells
    • October 17th: Brief Histories of Medicine, Salerno, and Galen
    • October 19th: Politicizing Science and Medicine
    • October 24th: COVID-19 Facial Covering Rhetoric
    • October 26th: Wells, H. G. Time Machine. Ch. 1-5
    • October 31st: Wells, H. G. The Time Machine Ch. 6-The End
    • October 3rd: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 7 and Conclusion
    • September 12th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 7 and Conclusion
    • September 19th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Prefaces and Ch. 1
    • September 26th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 2
    • September 28th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem at Large (Technology), Ch. 5 and 6
    • September 7th: Collins & Pinch’s The Golem (Science), Ch. 5 and 6
  • New Media: Gender, Culture, Technology
    • August 19: Introduction to the Course
    • August 21: More Introduction
    • August 26th: Consider Media-ted Arguments
    • August 28th: Media & American Culture
    • November 13th: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 3
    • November 18th: Feminism’s Non-Monolithic Nature
    • November 20th: Compulsory Heterosexuality
    • November 25th: Presentation Discussion
    • November 4: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 1
    • November 6: Hank Green’s An Absolutely Remarkable Thing, Part 2
    • October 16th: No Class Meeting
    • October 21: Misunderstanding the Internet, Part 1
    • October 23: Misunderstanding the Internet, Part 2
    • October 28: The Internet, Part 3
    • October 2nd: Hauntology
    • October 30th: Social Construction of Sexuality
    • October 7:  Myth in American Culture
    • September 11: Critical Theory
    • September 16th: Social Construction of Gender and Sexuality
    • September 18th: Postmodernism, Part 1
    • September 23rd: Postmodernism, Part 2
    • September 25th: Postmodernism, Part 3
    • September 30th: Capitalist Realism
    • September 4th: The Medium is the Message!
    • September 9: The Public Sphere
  • Science Fiction and American Culture
    • April 10th: Octavia Butler’s Dawn (Parts III and IV)
    • April 15th: The Dispossessed (Part I)
    • April 17th: The Dispossessed (Part II)
    • April 1st: Interstellar (2014)
    • April 22nd: In/Human Beauty
    • April 24: Witch Hunt Politics (Part I)
    • April 29th: Witch Hunt Politics (Part II)
    • April 3rd: Catch Up and Start Octavia Butler
    • April 8th: Octavia Butler’s Dawn (Parts I and II)
    • February 11: William Gibson, Part II
    • February 18: Use Your Illusion I
    • February 20: Use Your Illusion II
    • February 25th: Firefly and Black Mirror
    • February 4th: Writing Discussion: Ideas & Arguments
    • February 6th: William Gibson, Part I
    • January 14th: Introduction to to “Science Fiction and American Culture”
    • January 16th: More Introduction
    • January 21st: Robots and Zombies
    • January 23rd: Gender Studies and Science Fiction
    • January 28th: American Studies Introduction
    • January 30th: World’s Beyond
    • March 11th: All Systems Red
    • March 13th: Zone One (Part 1)
      • Zone One “Friday”
    • March 18th: Zone One, “Saturday”
    • March 20th: Zone One, “Sunday”
    • March 25th: Synthesizing Sources; Writing Gooder
      • Writing Discussion–Outlines
    • March 27th: Inception (2010)
  • Teaching Portfolio
  • Topics for Analysis
    • A Practical Editing Situation
    • American Culture, an Introduction
    • Cultural Studies and Science Fiction Films
    • Efficiency in Writing Reviews
    • Feminism, An Introduction
    • Fordism/Taylorism
    • Frankenstein Part I
    • Frankenstein Part II
    • Futurism Introduction
    • How to Lie with Statistics
    • How to Make an Argument with Sources
    • Isaac Asimov’s “A Cult of Ignorance”
    • Judith Butler, an Introduction to Gender/Sexuality Studies
    • Langdon Winner Summary: The Politics of Technology
    • Oral Presentations
    • Oratory and Argument Analysis
    • Our Public Sphere
    • Postmodernism Introduction
    • Protesting Confederate Place
    • Punctuation Refresher
    • QT, the Existential Robot
    • Religion of Technology Discussion
    • Rhetoric, an Introduction
      • Analyzing the Culture of Technical Writer Ads
      • Rhetoric of Technology
      • Visual Culture
      • Visual Perception
      • Visual Perception, Culture, and Rhetoric
      • Visual Rhetoric
      • Visuals for Technical Communication
      • World War I Propaganda
    • The Great I, Robot Discussion
      • I, Robot Short Essay Topics
    • The Rhetoric of Video Games: A Cultural Perspective
      • Civilization, an Analysis
    • The Sopranos
    • Why Science Fiction?
    • Zombies and Consumption Satire
  • Video Games & American Culture
    • April 14th: Phallocentrism
    • April 21st: Video Games and Neoliberalism
    • April 7th: Video Games and Conquest
    • Assignments for Video Games & American Culture
    • February 10th: Aesthetics and Culture
    • February 17th: Narrative and Catharsis
    • February 24th: Serious Games
    • February 3rd: More History of Video Games
    • January 13th: Introduction to the course
    • January 20th: Introduction to Video Game Studies
    • January 27th: Games & Culture
      • Marxism for Video Game Analysis
      • Postmodernism for Video Game Analysis
    • March 24th: Realism, Interpretation(s), and Meaning Making
    • March 31st: Feminist Perspectives and Politics
    • March 3rd: Risky Business?

Contact Me

Office: Fretwell 255F
Email: atoscano@uncc.edu
Conference Presentations » SEACS 2024 Presentation

SEACS 2024 Presentation

Original Title: The Rhetoric of World Dominance: American Culture and Interventionist Slogans
More-Suited Title: The Rhetoric of Saviors: American Ideology and Imperialism
Settled Title: The Cold War Never Ended (or Maybe It Just Paused)

Scope of the Presentation

  • “Good Guy” Rhetoric and Ideology
  • American Exceptionalism
  • Orwellian Faith
  • So-Called Irrational Actors
  • Interventionist Rhetoric and Ukraine

Interventionist Statements in Recent History

  • “When America is engaged … we are a force for peace and stability.”
    –James A. Baker, III (circa 1990)
  • “…take the fight to the enemy in Afghanistan, in Iraq, and across the world.”
    –President George W. Bush (8/28/2007)
  • “Our relationship serves as a cornerstone for security, democracy, and human rights in Ukraine and the broader region.”
    —The White House (9/01/2021) & Antony J. Blinken

Unpacking the Rhetorical Layers in the Above Statements

  • Beyond the scope of a 15-20 minute presentation
  • Requires a discussion of historical context
  • George W. Bush, although with clouded judgment, was looking to deal with 9/11
    • With an 86%-90% (Gallup) approval rating following 9/11, he had a ‘god’ complex

Wayne Slater, Austin bureau chief for the Dallas Morning News, co-wrote Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush.

Bush believes very much in the core ideas of Christianity….Now, publicly he’s very, very wise not to say, “I’m God’s candidate”….Privately, he has said those things. He said he believes that he is God’s candidate–that God has chosen him. –General

Slater, Wayne. “The Spirituality of George W. Bush.” Frontline.com, 29 April 2004.

Definitions of Rhetoric

  • Cy Knoblauch: “the theory and practice of public discourse, the arts of communication, argument, narrative, and persuasion” (21)
  • Aristotle: “Let rhetoric be [defined as] an ability, in each [particular] case, to see the available means of persuasion” (1.2.1, Kennedy p. 37)
  • Cultural Studies: how meaning is conveyed through concepts, discourse, and artifacts.

Rhetoric of the “Good Guy”

  • Manifest Destiny–ordained by a divine being
    • John Gast’s “American Progress” (1872)
  • Military Intervention Good…if on god’s side
    • General William “Jerry” Boykin in 2003:
      “told a church gathering in Sandy, Ore., that foes like bin Laden and Hussein ‘will only be defeated if we come against them in the name of Jesus'” (Thompson)
  • Major General Thomas Solheim reflects on Desert Strom 30 years later (10:44.00)
    • “sacrificed for god and country” (11:53.00)
    • “under austere conditions” and the world’s most expensive military (11:07.00)
  • Jerry Falwell claims “The United States Constitution has as its cornerstone the Ten Commandments” (Winters para. 8)
  • American Tautology: Our interventions are always good because we’re good
    • Spiritual fitness in the armed services: “a basic tenet of spirituality: an individual understanding of and experience with that which transcends the self” (38).
    • National Defense University Press (2012)

“An organization that serves a higher purpose and has a moral and ethical culture has the potential to positively influence members’ worldviews, especially concerning purpose, values, and identity.”

Sweeney, Patrick J., Jeffrey E. Rhodes, and Bruce Boling. “Spiritual Fitness: A Key Component of Total Force Fitness.” Joint Force Quarterly, vol. 66, July 2012, p. 40.

Lesson from Billy Graham, Pastor to Presidents

  • George W. Bush claims, “Graham’s words planted the ‘mustard seed in my soul’ that eventually led to a decision to “recommit my heart to Jesus Christ” (BGEA Staff, 2024)
  • Frank Lambert notes Billy Graham’s moralistic rhetoric surrounding communism
    • “People like Billy Graham framed the Cold War as a moral conflict. It is evil versus good. It is godless communism versus a God-fearing America.”
    • “…he was able to cast his message as one of God-fearing America against godless communism.”
    • William Randolph Hearst “puffs Graham” and elevates him on the national stage
  • “[R]evival of evangelical expectation” following the Soviets acquiring a nuclear bomb: “Billy Graham…assailed the Antichrist of godless communism and warned the wayward of the imminence of Armageddon” (Noble 109).

Orwellian Faith

  • Cafeteriazation of Religious Beliefs
  • Double-Think (Orwell 32-33)
    • The mystical mind is already primed–through immersion or force–to be moved by good vs evil narratives
  • Donald J. Trump pushes the idea he’s been ordained by god
    • Truth Social video (to 1:30.00): “on June 14, 1946, God looked down on his planned paradise and said, ‘‘’I need a caretaker,’’ so God gave us Trump.”
  • Many evangelicals believe Trump is ordained by god

Barry Hankins, historian and expert on evangelicalism:

“[Trump’s] support has gone from begrudging to enthusiastic. Many evangelicals now see Trump as their champion and defender — perhaps even savior….Unwittingly, in my view, many evangelicals are welcoming authoritarianism and courting blasphemy.

Kornfield, Meryl et al. “‘Ordained by God’: Trump’s Legal Problems Galvanize Iowa Evangelicals.” The Washington Post, 14 Jan. 2024.

American Exceptionalism and Its Limits

  • Republican Party Platform “Preamble”
    • “We believe in American Exceptionalism. We belive the United States of America is unlike any other nation on earth” (p. 1)
    • “…the people, not the government, are the best stewards of our country’s God-given natural resources.” (p. 1)
  • Interestingly, Al Gore, Jr.’s Earth in the Balance (1992) invokes christian stewardship as a way to protect the environment, but laments that
    “critics have gained currency in part because of the prevailing silence with which most denominations have reacted to the growing evidence of an ecological holocaust. Nor does it help that some religious leaders have seemed to encourage environmental recklessness.” (p. 245)
  • Seymour Martin Lipset (p. 66)
    • Discussion of LBJ not infusing moralistic terms surrounding the Vietnam War
    • LBJ feared an anti-communist moralism would fuel a McCarthy-esque witchhunt

Support for a war is as moralistic as resistance to it. To endorse a war and call on people to kill others and die for the country, Americans must define their role in a conflict as being on God’s side against Satan–for morality, against evil.

Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword. Norton, 1997, p. 20.

American Rationality and Everyone Else

  • Immersed in American ideology
    • Markets good
    • Taxes bad
    • Consumerism
  • Economic Rationality
    • Utility Maximization: “The rational actor chooses the action, from among those given, which maximizes utility” (Simon)
    • Choose based on self interest
  • Knoblauch derives his definition of discourse from Wittgenstein’s (1968) concept of a “‘language game,’ a system of conventions governing the game’s players (speakers, writers, hearers, readers)” (21).
  • Ability to predict behavior (for game theory)
  • Geopolitical Context
    • Not doing what the United States claims is “appropriate” is irrational
    • Officials use the term perjoratively to denote madness
  • This is different and less powerful, rhetorically, than labeling someone “evil”
    • Axis of Evil: Iran, Iraq, North Korea
    • Geroge W. Bush on Saddam Hussein being an “evil doer”
    • Bush saw into Vladimir Putin’s soul…(Robertson)
    • As the US’s irrational actions in Iraq and Afghanistan deepened, Putin wasn’t on board
  • Putin apparently warned Bush that a terrorist attack was coming to the United States (Stent)

Irrational Actors

  • Terrorists
  • States sponsoring terrorism
    • Cuba, Iran, North Korea, Syria (US State Department)
  • Belligerent Leaders and States
    • Vladimir Putin
    • Kim Jong-il
    • Iran supports a variety of “terrorist” groups with weapons (US Dept of State)

Irrational Actions (what gets you on the list)

  • Anti-tank weapons, assault rifles, training, etc.
  • Being allied with Iran (Syria)
  • North Korean “Concerns”
    • Restricting free expression, the press, and the internet, censorship
    • Harsh Prison Conditions
    • Allowing human rights abuses

Righteousness as Absolute Truth

  • Absolutist views of one’s divine guidance create blinders
  • Powerful rhetorical move for those like-minded…entire political parties
  • Preachers, Presidents, Promoters
  • Bush’s righteousness blinded him to the calls from religious authorities (Pew Research Center)
  • White Christian Nationalism
    • Black and Brown groups are “terrorists”
    • White people are … (Byman)

CONCLUSION

Definition of state sponsor of terrorism, State Dept Assessment of Cuba

“For decades, the Cuban government has fed, housed, and provided medical care for murderers, bombmakers, and hijackers, while many Cubans go hungry, homeless, and without basic medicine.”

US Embassy in Cuba. “U.S. Announces Designation of Cuba as a State Sponsor of Terrorism.” 11 January, 2021.

Works Cited

Aristotle. On Rhetoric: A Theory of Civic Discourse. 2nd ed. Trans. George A. Kennedy. Oxford, UP: 2007.

Cole, Brendan. “George Bush Reveals Shock at Realizing Prigozhin Served Him: ‘I Survived’.” Newsweek. 11 Sept 2023, https://www.newsweek.com/bush-prigozhin-russia-ukraine-yaltast-petersburg-1825907

Gast, John. American Progress. 1872. Painting. Chromolithograph created by George A. Crofutt, 1873. http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/ppmsca.09855/.

Gore, Al, Jr. Earth in the Balance: Ecology and the Human Spirit. Houghton Mifflin, 1992.

Knoblauch, Cy. Discursive Ideologies: Reading Western Rhetoric. Utah State UP, 2014.

Kornfield, Meryl, Colby Itkowitz, Hannah Knowles, and Marianne LeVine. “‘Ordained by God’: Trump’s Legal Problems Galvanize Iowa Evangelicals. The Washington Post, 14 Jan. 2024, https://www.washingtonpost.com/elections/2024/01/14/trump-evangelicals-iowa/

Lipset, Seymour Martin. American Exceptionalism: A Double-edged Sword. Norton, 1997.

Moore, James and Wayne Slater. Bush’s Brain: How Karl Rove Made George W. Bush. Wiley, 2003.

Noble, David F. The Religion of Technology: The Divinity of Man and the Spirit of Invention. Penguin, 1999.

Orwell, George. 1984. The New American Library of World Literature, 1961.

Pew Research Center. Religion News Service. “Religious Groups Issue Statements on War with Iraq.” 19 March 2003, https://www.pewresearch.org/religion/2003/03/19/publicationpage-aspxid616/

Robberson, Tod. The Dallas Morning News. “I looked the Man (Putin) in the Eye and Saw … The Enemy.” 29 June 2010. https://www.dallasnews.com/opinion/2010/06/29/i-looked-the-man-putin-in-the-eye-and-saw-the-enemy/

Simon, HA. “Rationality in Society.” International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Edited by N. J. Smelser and P. B. Baltes. Pergamon, 2001, pp. 12782-12786.

Stent, Angela. “The Impact of September 11 on US-Russian Relations.” Brookings. 8 September 2021, https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-impact-of-september-11-on-us-russian-relations/

Sweeney, Patrick J., Jeffrey E. Rhodes, and Bruce Boling. “Spiritual Fitness: A Key Component of Total Force Fitness.” Joint Force Quarterly, vol. 66, July 2012, https://ndupress.ndu.edu/Portals/68/Documents/jfq/jfq-66/jfq-66_35-41_Sweeney-Rhodes-Boling.pdf?ver=2017-12-06-115617-820

Thompson, Mark. “The Boykin Affair.” Cnn.com. 27 October 2003. https://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/10/27/timep.boykin.tm/

U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Counterterrorism. Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Cuba. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2021/cuba/

U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Counterterrorism. Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Iran. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2021/iran/

U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Democracy, Human Rights, and Labor. 2019 Country Reports on Human Rights Practices: Democratic People’s Republic of Korea. https://www.state.gov/reports/2019-country-reports-on-human-rights-practices/north-korea/

U.S. Department of State. Bureau of Counterterrorism. Country Reports on Terrorism 2021: Syria. https://www.state.gov/reports/country-reports-on-terrorism-2021/syria/

Winters, Michael Sean. “How the Ghost of Jerry Falwell Conquered the Republican Party.” The New Republic, 5 March 2012, https://newrepublic.com/article/101296/falwell-gop-winters

Skip to toolbar
  • Log In